Questions

Answers

the best minds disagree to the ends of time on this one. the best explanation is that light will travel away from you at the speed of light, even if ure traveling just a few meters per second slower than total light speed, if you are at the speed of light, light wont travel faster than you, OR light is travelling on such a fast frequency it cant be seen, so either way, youre headlamps wont be visable

a system developed as a sub plan of the luddendorf plan but could not of possibly been accomplished due to the underwhelming technological demands, couldnt of been feasable in 1917. however it has had long since been the legendary idea of the supreme tactic in war. however a break-down of blitzkreig showed its very many problems (caused whole-saley from hitler himself) although he put his name on the tactic, hitler did little or no good for the tactics name and deployed it in every theatre of battle because of his terrible state of controllive mind , thought it would triumph everytime from mainly the fault of france due to ther (as ever) inedquecy to defend their own country since the fall of nepolian (also referres to hitler from the munich putch)

the docterine was the have a "lightening war" a savage and definable blow striaght into the heels of the enemy, no the heart. at first blitz would concentrate on capturing stategic locations of transport by parra troop and fast attack or light armoured fighing vehicles. supported by long range artillery, the panzers would then strike to make the armoured fist and a bridgehead in the enemies defences, allowing the LAFV and parra troops (now re-enforced with the wehrmacht that where transported with the tanks).

the idea would be implemented in only a smallish (no more than 20 square miles) of land and maybe done simultaniously by 2 or 3 armies. this would simply tear the enemy through without needing to use attrition to break the enemy.

however that was the case in poland and fance, in the case of russia the fronts could be 200 square miles not 20, and was impossible. the german armies where far too over specialised so they bread-in huge weaknesses in terms of been able to react quickly if events changed, and thusly, was there un-doing... thankfully

when the USSR collapsed in the 90's, an independence movementformed up called the CNC Chechen National Congress. they went against boris yeltsins fed. of russia, they sed that Chechnya wasnt an independent entity within the Soviet Union but was going to remain part of the russian federation for economic reason SO because they didnt want ti initially in 1990 as they would because a socialism republic state,they would not have a right under the Soviet constitution to break up and be themselves. other ethnic groups where also included in the as Chechnya also spoke its own language, because of a whole heap of disgreement and sectret factional work carried out by disidents into russia by causing terrorism, russia was inclinded to take military action against the state because negotiation where not persisiting, that was also quite similar the the case of afghanistan aswell, which may of been used as a template for the trouble in Chechnya.

when i was in audi in ingolstadt, the rolled off one car every 32 seconds 24/7. quite impressive really

it (as it is today) based loosely aroud the mesotopian countries like ancient greece and myciltien, (spelling wrong there lol) which used the principles of greek polytheimsm which coupled a lot of democractic ideals (but as it wasnt a monotheism religion we dont count it as democractic) the same ideals where adopted by the romans who conqured and injested the cultures of their conqured lands to reduce revolts. the ideals where brought up throughout the latter end of middle ages when lost roman secrets where been reseached and rediscovered. it wasnt until the renesaunce did the sides of democracy loose or gain throught europe, inwhich, it still took until the end of WW1 for universal sufferage to take effect in europe, its been a bit of a long journey hehe