Questions

Answers

I'm a moderator.

When a moderator sends you a message it'll say 'Message from moderator/administrator' in your notifications box - that seems to be the only way that we're identified on the site at the moment - but as people have said, it's still in beta phase, so it will probably change.

I don't know what an 'administrator' is.

Beeper – you spot plagiarism by copying a line from a suspicious answer into google (in quote marks) and seeing what comes up.

A way for members to report abuse would be good – if there’s something the moderators miss – maybe a ‘report abuse’ link that could fire off an email to someone relevant.

I think there’s scope for more guidance on what kinds of things are acceptable as questions. For instance, there have been several examples of well-established members posting questions that take the mickey out of guest questions. I don’t really think that’s a good idea, as it makes the site seem elitist and unfriendly (although we certainly get some stunningly unimpressive questions). I’d also like to see something about not posting personal comments of whatever kind as questions, but instead leaving comments on each other’s questions/answers (if a forum were to be set up, this wouldn’t be a problem anymore, of course).

Are these to be taken as guidelines or as rules? It needs to be clear whether these are things that should be followed at all times. Obviously plagiarism or obscenity will be dealt with harshly wherever spotted. But if a guest stumbles across the site and asks a question about spiders that’s already been asked a hundred times, should that question be penalised? The wording of these guidelines should let members know what’s obligatory and what isn’t – it should maybe be divided into two sections – Rules (don’t copy, don’t swear) and Guidelines (please use the search to see whether the question’s been asked already).

My favourite theatre is either The Swan at Stratford (RSC) or the Young Vic in Waterloo - both are small enough to be intimate, and the seats all have great views of the stage.

Favourite play is trickier. I love Shakespeare, but sometimes bad plays get great poductions. I saw a superb Henry 6th parts 1, 2 and 3 a few years back, which are rubbish plays, but brilliant productions. I've seen at least 50 Shakespeare productions, and most have been very good. Most recent was a marvellous Antony and Cleo starring Patriock Stewart. Kenneth Branagh as Hamlet also really stands out. My favoutite Shakespeares are Henry 4th parts 1 and 2 and Henry 5th, because they have such enormous scope - the whole of England as it was then is represented there, and they perfectly mix comedy, chronicle and tragedy.

I also really love Harold Pinter's plays - my favourites are The Homecoming and The Caretaker - but I can't really explain why. You either get them or you don't. But I go to the theatre all the time, and have seen dozens of good plays, so picking a favourite is tricky.

One real standout was Shockheaded Peter, a retelling of some old German nursery rhymes. It used weird music, puppets, and cod Victorian/grand guignol staging, and might just be the single most entertaining thing I've ever experienced.

Derek Jacobi - now Sir Derek. There were eight members of the first company (ie eight actors). I'm not sure who the others were, apart from Olivier, but Joan Plowright, Maggie Smith, Robert Stephens and Frank Finlay may have been among them.

If it's about IQ then I'll happily pass it on for you (leave it as a comment on this answer, or if you don't want everyone to see what it is then on one of my old answers - I'll still see it, and can delete it afterwards.) If you don't want to tell me what it is, or if it isn't about IQ, then I'm sure Lycos has contact details on its home page somewhere.